|
IoT Examples at FA Sites
Before the introduction of Self-Monitoring Sensors
Preventive maintenance |
● |
We want to avoid production line stoppage that might occur due to unexpected sensor failure. Line stoppage hours × (manufacturing unit cost / hour) = Loss |
● |
We want to minimize the production line down time to almost zero. |
|
 |
Problems |
◆The amount of data to be collected is large and this may lower the PLC processing capacity.
◆The burden of data analysis is large.
◆Resetting the replaced sensors is troublesome. |
|
|
After the introduction of Self‑Monitoring Sensors
From preventive maintenance to predictive maintenance
Leave the sensor diagnosis to the sensor itself.
● |
All you need to do is to monitor the sensor state. |
● |
PLC can be used exclusively for controlling devices. |
● |
Possible to check detail information at a desired timing. |
Leave the resetting for replaced sensors to the higher-level master
● |
Automatically written from the connected master. |
● |
Possible not only to save time but also to prevent human errors. |
IoT Examples at FA Sites 02
Before the introduction of Self-Monitoring Sensors
Remote controlling and batch settings |
● |
We want to place sensors close to sensing points as much as possible.
However, it is often difficult to make settings, particularly when there are many
sensors to install. |
● |
We want to send predetermined parameter values in a batch file for a repeater, etc. |
● |
We want to confirm that required sensors are properly connected at the startup
of the system. |
|
 |
Problems |
◆It takes time to set sensors.
◆We want to avoid mistakes in setting sensors or wiring.
|
|
|
After the introduction of Self‑Monitoring Sensors
Fully utilize the advantages of the IO‑Link output.
● |
Possible to read or write set values through external
interface. |
● |
Possible to set multiple sensors in a batch process. |
● |
Possible to save the set parameters in an external medium. |
● |
Possible to recognize and discriminate individual information. |
|
|